Tariq Ramadan, rated as the Muslim equivalent to the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Chief Rabbi,
http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/programmes/misc/insearchofgod.shtml
featured on this morning's BBC Radio 4 Sunday Programme. It's the last item.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/programmes/sunday/index.shtml
It appears that Muslims in Cambridge want to have closer ties with the Jewish community. In order to achieve this, however, 'extremists' on both sides will have to be reined in, 'marginalised' and made to see reason.
Examples of the Jewish equivalents of beheaders and amputators were not given, unfortunately. But Tariq did soothe away the wrinkles with his gorgeous French-accented voice, letting us know that Islam is now prepared to make some concessions over Israel. He did concede that 8-year old Israelis might be considered 'innocent' and thus spared the suicide bombers.
I wonder how they can tell. No doubt all 7-year old Israelis will be able to rejoice up to a point, but as for 9-year olds ....
Well that means that yours truly, as well as her daughter are not to be spared. A pity really. We were both, in our different ways, getting on so well with our Arab neighbours. Just recently, the British Council Director in Nazareth was very keen that I should visit a Druze Arab school, where they desperately need English teachers. I turned up (it's just up the Carmel from where I live) and expected the normal type of disorganized Israeli school - only slightly more chaotic maybe. Wrong! What I found (and my friend from Manchester, who had never visited israel before, and is coming back later this year, she loved it so much, with her daughter-in-law) was a palatial edifice in exquisite grounds, more reminiscent of the best that Cordoba has to offer in medieval mosques and churches than the typical inner city Greater Manchester school, for instance. And how had this come about? Funding from the Israeli Ministry of Education and donations from a Jewish philanthropist. That's how.
So, will these kids in the Druze comprehensive school also be targetted? What about the cafes and restaurants dotted around Haifa, many of them owned, or co-owned by members of the Arab community? What about the head of the blood unit at the local medical centre, also an Arab? Or the many staff and students at Haifa University? Or my daughter's new boss. All Arabs. The list could go on and on.
But what will no doubt come across to the thousands who listen and who learn about religion largely from programmes like these is that Professor Tariq Ramadan has made a considerable concession to the 'apartheid' State of Israel and that now it is time for that State to reciprocate in kind.
Frankly, I can't see what Israel can do more than it's doing, seeing as it's threatened with death from every side. But within its own parameters it has created an oasis of co-existence that could be a paradigm for the rest of the world.
As for Tariq, it's strange that he came across so conciliatory, when only recently he was involved in this escapade at the Turin Book Fair:
http://hereticallibrarian.blogspot.com/2008/02/tariq-ramadan-censor.html
for Tariq Ramadan is the grandson of the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, a little detail not mentioned by the Sunday Programme. The above blog speaks accurately of Tariq's 'rhetorical doublespeak'.
Yes, boycotting the Fair because of Israel's presence. Considering that Israelis read more books per head per week than practically any other group, as well as being involved in massive translation and editing jobs in and out of every language under the sun, it would surely have been a bit strange for it not to participate in this event. Especially, when you consider that Turin is the home of arguably the greatest Jewish writer of the 20th century, Primo Levi
http://books.guardian.co.uk/authors/author/0,,-104,00.html
Oh, and Tariq has apparently also called for a boycott of the Paris Book Fair as well (March 14th-19th), and for similar reasons!
But, as stated above, it's the voice that does it. That voice could win over nearly everyone, especially on radio, where you can't see the person's eyes. As it says in the good book:
The voice is the voice of Jacob, but the hands are the hands of Esau.
http://bible.cc/genesis/27-22.htm
No wonder, Judaism's greatest prophet, Moses, had a speech impediment. There's a great moral in that.
http://www.askmoses.com/article/241,297/Why-did-G-d-give-Moses-a-speech-impediment.html
For one thing you can definitely say about Moses - he was certainly not guilty of 'rhetorical doublespeak', and maybe that is part of the problem in today's media world.